Los Angeles, CA – Sunday evening I was asked to attend a debate with friends to discuss the health care reform. The invitation read “an exciting dialogue about the health care reform debate….” This exciting dialogue soon turned into an intense political debate amongst a diverse group of intelligent professionals’. It appears that this topic has also become a political catalyst for the mass media.
Wednesday’s Wall Street Journal discussed this agenda; however doesn’t clearly recall any objective information. Mr. Frank reports a biased account of his political views while demonstrating sensationalism in broadcasting.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203917304574415232884495424.html?mod=wsj_share_digg#articleTabs%3Darticle
If you’re looking for a clear account of how to either support or hold constituents’ responsible, this report will not prove valuable. The only value I see in this tale is how to lose my job if I work for the WSJ.
(Yesterday’s Los Angeles Times published an unbiased piece stating objective and factual information. )
‘U.S. Census Bureau data on the medically uninsured simply can't be denied’
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-hiltzik17-2009sep17,0,1400353.column
NB C-notes
14 years ago
No comments:
Post a Comment